Moez Echargui vs Francesco Maestrelli Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Aug at 12:25 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Echargui vs F. Maestrelli

TUN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Echargui 1 - 0 Maestrelli
They have played 2 sets in total, with Moez Echargui winning 2 and Francesco Maestrelli winning 0. The last match between Moez Echargui and Francesco Maestrelli was at the Porto Challenger, 03-08-2025, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with Moez Echargui getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Echargui | 1 |
| Maestrelli | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(F) Porto Challenger(08-03-25)
M. Echargui vs F. Maestrelli H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $3,190 | Career Prize Money | $11,285 |
| 59.50% (379-258) | Career Total W/L | 54.62% (189-157) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 17 | Titles | 5 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 100.00% (4-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Echargui vs F. Maestrelli Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performance analysis reveals Maestrelli winning 44.89% of points versus Echargui’s 43.38%. Could this small edge sway the match in Maestrelli’s favor?
- On returning second serves, Maestrelli holds a slight advantage with 46.98% versus Echargui’s 45.43%. How crucial is this edge in the match outcome?
- First serve return stats give Echargui a narrow lead, winning 29.09% compared to Maestrelli at 28.11%.
- Under pressure, Maestrelli excels by saving 56.96% of breakpoints, outperforming Echargui’s 54.1%. Does this show better composure under pressure?
- Overall performance shows Echargui winning 73.81% of matches over the last year, while Maestrelli has won 60.81%.
- Both players favor Hard courts, with Echargui holding a better win percentage of 66% compared to Maestrelli’s 58%.
- Despite playing against tougher opponents with an average rank of 333.23, Maestrelli has strong deciding set performance, winning 69%. How significant is this for match scenarios?
- Echargui plays more at lower-tier events and boasts a higher win percentage of 76.79% in those events compared to Maestrelli's 59.65% in a slightly higher tournament tier.
- Echargui has a significant lead in break point conversion rates at 40.17% versus Maestrelli’s 32.17%.
Editorial Prediction (August 3, 2025, UTC):
As we evaluate the current form and historical performance, it is clear that both players have distinct advantages in different areas. Maestrelli shows better performance in high-pressure scenarios, such as saving breakpoints and deciding sets, indicating a stronger mental fortitude.
Conversely, Echargui's overall win record suggests higher consistency and success, particularly in lower-tier events, and superior break point conversion efficiency presents him as a formidable opponent during critical match moments.
Despite Maestrelli's advantage under pressure, the overall strengths and recent performance trends favor Echargui. Based on these comprehensive stats, Echargui is more likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match.
Moez Echargui vs Francesco Maestrelli Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Echargui vs F. Maestrelli H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:15:21 | Average Match Time | 1:15:21 |
| 59% (30/51) | 1st Serve % | 49% (23/47) |
| 77% (23/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (16/23) |
| 71% (15/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (10/24) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
| 45% (21/47) | Return Points Win % | 25% (13/51) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Echargui Recent Matches Played
F. Maestrelli Recent Matches Played

M. Echargui vs F. Maestrelli Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.50% (379/258) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.62% (189/157) |
| 58.01% (865/626) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.79% (426/381) |
| 53.18% (7379/6496) | Games Win/Loss | 51.12% (3940/3768) |
| 66.94% (241/119) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.25% (45/35) |
| 51.78% (131/122) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.91% (123/97) |
| 29.17% (7/17) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.84% (21/22) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.42 |
| 1847 | Aces Total | 1571 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 1629 | Total Double Faults | 1125 |
| 1:42:40 | Average Match Time | 1:45:35 |
| 502.3 | Average Opponent Rank | 378.97 |
| 59% (23878/40398) | 1st Serve % | 61% (14137/23299) |
| 67% (15935/23878) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (9798/14137) |
| 49% (8162/16520) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (4229/9162) |
| 44% (2137/4821) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (998/2305) |
| 43% (17907/41576) | Return Points Win % | 40% (9436/23453) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 30.77% (4/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 54.55% (6/5) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Main Tour W/L | 12.50% (1/7) |
| 46.56% (88/101) | Challenger W/L | 53.28% (122/107) |
| 65.51% (283/149) | Futures W/L | 65.59% (61/32) |
| 60% (371/616) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (186/343) |
| 63% (5/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (92/168) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (59/106) |
| 53% (119/223) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (67/118) |
| 86% (368/315) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (156/139) |
| 14% (368/51) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (156/17) |
| 25% (268/67) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (190/48) |